Wp(C)/14537/2014 Of Perinthalmanna Service Co-Op.bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2, Tirur
High Court
10 Jun 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/14537/2014 Of Perinthalmanna Service Co-Op.bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2, Tirur
Date of order
10 Jun 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/14537/2014 Of Perinthalmanna Service Co-Op.bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2, Tirur, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE 2014/20TH JYAISHTA, 1936
WP(C).No. 14537 of 2014 (N)
----------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
--------------
PERINTHALMANNA SERVICE CO-OP.BANK LTD,
HOSPITAL ROAD, PERINTHALMANNA,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-679 322,
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.ANAND (SR.) SMT.LATHA KRISHNAN
RESPONDENT(S):
--------------
1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
WARD 2,OFFICE OF THE ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,TRAFFIC BAZAR, TOWN HALL ROAD, TIRUR-676 101.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
(APPEALS) KOZHIKODE.
BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-06-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RVS/
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :
-------------------------
EXT.P1.THE TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER.
EXT.P2.THE TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM FILED BY THE PETITIONER.
EXT.P3.THE TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM APPLICATION FOR STAY.
EXT.P4.THE TRUE COPY OF PROCEEDINGS DATED 19/3/2014.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS-------------------------
NIL.
/true copy/
P.A.TO JUDGE
rvs/
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
W.P.(C).No. 14537 of 2014 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated 10[th] June, 2014- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
JUDGMENT
Ext.P1 is the assessment order passedagainst the petitioner for the year 2009-10against which petitioner filed Ext.P2 appealand Ext.P3 stay petition. During thependency of appeal and stay petition beforethe 2[nd]respondent, revenue recoveryproceedings have been initiated against thepetitioner by Ext.P4. It is in thiscontext, the writ petition is filed.
2. In the above circumstances, it isdirected that the 2[nd]respondent shallconsider Ext.P3 stay petition within aperiod of one month from today and in themeanwhile, further proceedings pursuant toExt.P4 shall be kept in abeyance until
WP(C).14537/14
such orders are passed, which orders shall
determine the matter thereafter.
Writ petition disposed of.
Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, Judge
Mrcs
//True Copy//
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.