Wp(C)/1461/2015 Of Thirunavaya Grama Panchayath v. Income Tax Officer, (Tds)
High Court
15 Jan 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/1461/2015 Of Thirunavaya Grama Panchayath v. Income Tax Officer, (Tds)
Date of order
15 Jan 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/1461/2015 Of Thirunavaya Grama Panchayath v. Income Tax Officer, (Tds), the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/25TH POUSHA, 1936
WP(C).No. 1461 of 2015 (G)
---------------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
----------------------
THIRUNAVAYA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, THIRUNAVAYA-676301, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY THE PRESIDENT IN CHARGE V.MUHAMMED SHERIFF
BY ADV. SRI.C.E.UNNIKRISHNAN
RESPONDENT(S):
-------------------------
1. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (TDS),
AAYAKAR BHAVAN, MANACHIRA, KOZHIKODE-673001.
2. SMT.JASEELA, ASSISTANT ENGINEER, KALLADA IRRIGATION PROJECT, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM PUBLIC, THIRUNAVAYA-690518.
3. THE BRANCH MANAGER/HEAD, KERALA GRAMIN BANK, THIRUNAVAYA BRANCH, THIRUNAVAYA-676301.
R1 BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX R3 BY SRI.DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
---------------------------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS
-----------------------------------
P1:COPY OF THE CHELAN EVIDENCING PAYMENT OF TAX DEDUCTED AT SOURCE FOR THE PERIOD 2008-2009SOURCE FOR THE PERIOD 2008-2009
P1(A): COPY OF THE CHELAN EVIDENCING PAYMENT OF TAX DEDUCTED AT SOURCE FOR THE PERIOD 2008-2009SOURCE FOR THE PERIOD 2008-2009
P1(B): COPY OF THE CHELAN EVIDENCING PAYMENT OF TAX DEDUCTED AT SOURCE FOR THE PERIOD 2008-2009SOURCE FOR THE PERIOD 2008-2009
P1(C): COPY OF THE CHELAN EVIDENCING PAYMENT OF TAX DEDUCTED AT SOURCE FOR THE PERIOD 2008-2009SOURCE FOR THE PERIOD 2008-2009
P2:COPY OF THE CHELAN EVIDENCING PAYMENT OF TAX DEDUCTED AT SOURCE FOR THE PERIOD 2009-2010SOURCE FOR THE PERIOD 2009-2010
P2(A): COPY OF THE CHELAN EVIDENCING PAYMENT OF TAX DEDUCTED AT SOURCE FOR THE PERIOD 2009-2010SOURCE FOR THE PERIOD 2009-2010
P2(B): COPY OF THE CHELAN EVIDENCING PAYMENT OF TAX DEDUCTED AT SOURCE FOR THE PERIOD 2009-2010SOURCE FOR THE PERIOD 2009-2010
P2(C): COPY OF THE CHELAN EVIDENCING PAYMENT OF TAX DEDUCTED AT SOURCE FOR THE PERIOD 2000-2010SOURCE FOR THE PERIOD 2000-2010
P3:COPY OF THE LETTER NO.ITO/TDS/CLT/H.GRIEV/2014-2015 DATED 9/12/14
P4:COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 18/12/14
P5:COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.ITNS.27 DATED 18/12/14
P6:COPY OF THE LIST OF EMPLOYEES AGAINST WHOM ACTION IS SOUGHT TO BE TAKENBE TAKEN
P7:COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED 26/12/14 ISSUED AGAINST SMT.K.K.MINI.SMT.K.K.MINI.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS
-------------------------------------
NIL.
/ TRUE COPY /
P.S.TO JUDGE
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.-------------------------------
W.P.(C).NO.1461 OF 2015 (G)
-----------------------------------
Dated this the 15[th] day of January, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner is a Panchayat, and in the writ petition, it isaggrieved by Ext.P3 and P5 notices issued to it by the 1[st] respondentin connection with recovery of penalty amounts that were confirmedon it under the Income Tax Act. It is the case of the petitioner that,while it has not preferred any appeal under the Income Tax Actagainst the penalty orders, due to financial constraints, it will not beable to honour the payments that are now demanded from it, withinthe period insisted upon by the 1[st] respondent. It is also pointed outthat, on account of Ext.P5 notice that has been issued freezing thebank accounts of the petitioner, the petitioner is not able to carry onits activities including payment of wages to its employees. In thatfactual scenario, the limited prayer of the petitioner now, is for thegrant of an installment facility for effecting the payments due to the1[st] respondent.
2. I have heard Sri.C.E.Unnikrishnan, the learned counselappearing for the petitioner, Sri.Jose Joseph, the learned Standingcounsel appearing for the 1[st] respondent as also Sri.DevanRamachandran, the learned counsel appearing for the 3[rd] respondent.
On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case asalso the submissions made across the Bar and also taking into accountthe plea of financial hardship urged on behalf of the petitioner, Idispose the writ petition with the following directions:-
(i) If the petitioner pays an amount ofRs.5,00,000/- on or before 15.2.2015 and thereafterpays the balance amount due under Ext.P3 notice,together with accrued interest, in three equal andsuccessive monthly installments commencing from15.4.2015, then further proceedings pursuant toExts.P3 and P5 notices shall be kept in abeyance bythe 1[st] respondent.
(ii) The petitioner is permitted to operate thebank account covered by Ext.P5 notice, and theoperation of Ext.P5 notice shall stand suspended tothat extent for the time being.
(iii) It is made clear that if the petitionercommits a default in respect of any of theinstallments, he will lose the benefit of this judgmentand the 1[st] respondent will be free to continueproceedings against the petitioner from the stage atwhich they presently stand.
prp
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.