Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/14622/2023 Of Vadakedath Vivekanan...

Wp(C)/14622/2023 Of Vadakedath Vivekanandan Sreedevi v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)

High Court 28 Apr 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/14622/2023 Of Vadakedath Vivekanandan Sreedevi v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
28 Apr 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/14622/2023 Of Vadakedath Vivekanandan Sreedevi v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN FRIDAY, THE 28 DAY OF APRIL 2023 / 8TH VAISAKHA, 1945WP(C) NO. 14622 OF 2023 PETITIONER: VADAKEDATH VIVEKANANDAN SREEDEVI,AGED 57 YEARS, W/O A.K.SANTHOSH,ARAKKATHARA HOUSE, PALLURUTHY P.O., ERNAKULAM, KOCHI, PIN - 682006 BY ADVS.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM)SABU PULLAN GOKUL D. SUDHAKARANR.BHASKARA KRISHNANK.P.SATHEESAN (SR.) RESPONDENTS: 1THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110001 2THE ASSESSING OFFICER ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, NEW DELHI, PIN – 11001 SRI. JOSE JOSEPH (STANDING COUNSEL) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.04.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msp JUDGMENT Against Ext. P1 assessment order issued by the 2[nd] respondent, the petitioner has preferred Ext. P2 appealbefore the 1[st] respondent along with Ext. P3 stay petition.The grievance of the petitioner is that pending the appealand the stay petition, recovery proceedings are beinginitiated for recovering the amount assessed as per Ext. P1.The 1[st] respondent shall take up Ext. P3 stay petition andpass orders thereon expeditiously. Till then, recoveryproceedings pursuant to Ext. P1 shall be deferred. The writ petition is disposed accordingly. Sd/- MURALI PURUSHOTHAMANJUDGE APPENDIX OF WP(C) 14622/2023 PETITIONER EXHIBITSExhibit-P1TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 27-03-2023Exhibit-P2TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL (CIT(A)NFAC 2018-19) FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 19-04-2023Exhibit-P3TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FOR STAY FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 19-04-2023
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan