Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/14711/2016 Of Shri.r.mohandas v. T...

Wp(C)/14711/2016 Of Shri.r.mohandas v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 30 Sep 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/14711/2016 Of Shri.r.mohandas v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
30 Sep 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp(C)/14711/2016 Of Shri.r.mohandas v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS THURSDAY, THE 30 DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 8TH ASWINA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 14711 OF 2016 PETITIONER : SHRI.R.MOHANDAS,AGED 50 YEARS,CHIRAKKAL P.O, KANNUR - 670 011. S/O.K.N.RAGHAVAN, SHANTHI NIKETHAN, BY ADVS.SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SR.)SRI.V.P.NARAYANANSRI.V.V.VARGHESE RESPONDENTS: 1THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,AAYKAR BHAVAN, NORTH BLOCK, KOZHIKODE - 673 001.2THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 1, KANNUR - 670 001. 3THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, KOZHIKODE - 673 001.4UNION OF INDIA,REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI 110 001. REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, BY ADV.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 14711 OF 2016 BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P.(C).No.14711 of 2016=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=Dated this the 30[th] day of September, 2021 JUDGMENT In the light of the Memo dated 22.09.2021, this writpetition is dismissed as withdrawn. RKM Sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan