Wp(C)/14844/2011 Of M/S.kancor Ingredients Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
24 Nov 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/14844/2011 Of M/S.kancor Ingredients Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
24 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp(C)/14844/2011 Of M/S.kancor Ingredients Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn interms of the memo.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
WEDNESDAY, THE 24 DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 14844 OF 2011
PETITIONER :
M/S.KANCOR INGREDIENTS LIMITEDKANCOR ROAD,ANGAMALLY SOUTH-683573,RERESENTED, BY ITS HEAD OF ACCOUNTS SAJI THOMAS.
BY ADVS.SRI.JOSEPH MARKOSE (SR.)SRI.V.ABRAHAM MARKOSSRI.BINU MATHEWSRI.B.J.JOHN PRAKASHSRI.MATHEWS K.UTHUPPACHANSRI.TERRY V.JAMESSRI.TOM THOMAS KAKKUZHIYIL
RESPONDENTS :
1THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE 2 (1),ERNAKULAM-682018.CIRCLE 2 (1),ERNAKULAM-682018.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KOCHI-682018.
CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDINGS, I.S.PRESS ROAD,
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON24.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=W.P.(C) No.14844 of 2021=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dated this the 24[th] day of November, 2021
JUDGMENT
The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner seekspermission to withdraw the writ petition and a memo to that effecthas already been filed.
Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn interms of the memo.
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JUDGE
RKM
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.