Wp(C)/15194/2011 Of P.m.santhosh @ Santhosh Madhavan v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
26 Nov 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/15194/2011 Of P.m.santhosh @ Santhosh Madhavan v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
26 Nov 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/15194/2011 Of P.m.santhosh @ Santhosh Madhavan v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
TUESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 / 5TH AGRAHAYANA, 1941WP(C).No.15194 OF 2011(Y)
PETITIONER:
P.M.SANTHOSH @ SANTHOSH MADHAVANSWAMY AMRUTHA CHAITHANYA,, AGED 39 YEARS,, 4B, ROYAL STADIUM MANSION, KADAVANTHRA,, KOCHI-20.
BY ADV. SRI.C.P.UDAYABHANU
RESPONDENTS:
R1 BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAXR1 BY ADV. SRI.MADHU RADHAKRISHNANR1 BY ADV. SRI.P.RADHAKRISHNAN 1
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON26.11.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.15194 OF 2011(Y)
JUDGMENT
This writ petition has been filed challenging Ext.P2proceedings issued pending assessment to Income Tax inrespect of the assessment years 2003-2004 to 2008-2009. Itis submitted by the learned counsel appearing for therespondents that the proceedings challenged have beenissued at the stage of provisional assessment. It is statedthat the assessment in respect of the years in question iscomplete.
In the above view of the matter, I am of the opinionthat nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition.This writ petition is, therefore, closed as infructuous withoutprejudice to the contentions of the petitioner which are leftopen to be decided in appropriate proceedings against theassessment, if any.
Sd/-
ANU SIVARAMAN
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.