Wp(C)/1556/2010 Of P.a.yesudas v. Agrl. Income Tax

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 18TH JANUARY 2010 / 28TH POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 1556 of 2010(T) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- P.A.YESUDAS, AGRI AGRO IRRIGATION & SPRINGLERS SYSTEM, KUZHALMANNAM. BY ADVS. MR.N.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR, SMT.K.HYMAVATHY. RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX & COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, ALATHUR. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. C.K.GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J ----------------------------- ------------------------------ Dated this the 18[th] day of January, 2010. J U D G M E N T As per Ext.P1 order passed by the first respondent, the registration of the petitioner under the Kerala Value Added Tax Actwas cancelled for the reasons stated therein. Aggrieved by Ext.P1,the petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 appeal along with Ext.P3 petitionfor early hearing and the said proceedings are stated as pendingbefore the second respondent. The prayer of the petitioner is onlyto direct the second respondent to consider and pass appropriateorders on Ext.P2 appeal and P3 stay petition. 2.Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. Considering the facts and circumstances the secondrespondent is directed to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 appealin accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing thepetitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within onemonth from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENONJUDGE