Wp(C)/15607/2019 Of Beena Jose v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
07 Jun 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/15607/2019 Of Beena Jose v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
07 Jun 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/15607/2019 Of Beena Jose v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
FRIDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF JUNE 2019 / 17TH JYAISHTA, 1941WP(C).No. 15607 of 2019
PETITIONER:
BEENA JOSEAGED 61 YEARSW/O (LATE) SHRI.JOSE GEORGE,B-2, GALAXY MARVEL, ELAMAKKARA, ERNAKULAM -682026
BY ADVS.SRI.ASWIN GOPAKUMARSRI.NIRANJAN SUDHIRSRI.RENOY VINCENT
RESPONDENTS:
THUSHARA JAMES GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07.06.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, aggrieved by assessmentorder under the Income Tax Act, 1961 preferredappeal. This appeal is pertained to sevenassessment year. There is a delay about 143 daysin filing appeal. The petitioner also moved stayapplications along with this appeal.
There shall be a direction to the 1strespondent to consider the delay as well as stayapplication within a period of two months. Tillthe disposal of the applications as above,coercive steps based on the impugned orders inthe appeal shall be deferred.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P12TRUE COPY OF THE ELECTRONICALLY GENERATED FORM NO.35 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT CHALLENGING THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE PERIOD 2014-15FORM NO.35 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT CHALLENGING THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE PERIOD 2014-15
EXHIBIT P13TRUE COPY OF THE ELECTRONICALLY GENERATED FORM NO.35 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT CHALLENGING THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE PERIOD 2015-16FORM NO.35 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT CHALLENGING THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE PERIOD 2015-16
EXHIBIT P14TRUE COPY OF THE ELECTRONICALLY GENERATED FORM NO.35 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT CHALLENGING THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE PERIOD 2016-17FORM NO.35 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT CHALLENGING THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE PERIOD 2016-17
EXHIBIT P15TRUE COPY OF THE ELECTRONICALLY GENERATED FORM NO.35 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT CHALLENGING THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE PERIOD 2017-18FORM NO.35 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT CHALLENGING THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE PERIOD 2017-18
EXHIBIT P16TRUE COPY OF THE STAY APPLICATION SUBMITTEDBY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENTFOR THE PERIOD 2011-12BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENTFOR THE PERIOD 2011-12
EXHIBIT P17TRUE COPY OF THE STAY APPLICATION SUBMITTEDBY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENTFOR THE PERIOD 2012-13BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENTFOR THE PERIOD 2012-13
EXHIBIT P18TRUE COPY OF THE STAY APPLICATION SUBMITTEDBY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENTFOR THE PERIOD 2013-14BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENTFOR THE PERIOD 2013-14
EXHIBIT P19TRUE COPY OF THE STAY APPLICATION SUBMITTEDBY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENTFOR THE PERIOD 2014-15BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENTFOR THE PERIOD 2014-15
EXHIBIT P20TRUE COPY OF THE STAY APPLICATION SUBMITTEDBY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENTFOR THE PERIOD 2015-16BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENTFOR THE PERIOD 2015-16
EXHIBIT P21TRUE COPY OF THE STAY APPLICATION SUBMITTEDBY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENTFOR THE PERIOD 2016-17BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENTFOR THE PERIOD 2016-17
EXHIBIT P22TRUE COPY OF THE STAY APPLICATION SUBMITTEDBY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENTFOR THE PERIOD 2017-18BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENTFOR THE PERIOD 2017-18
SAS/07/06/2019
//TRUE COPY//P.A. TO JUDGEP.A. TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.