Wp(C)/1561/2019 Of Kandappan Hamza v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (International Taxation)
High Court
18 Jan 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/1561/2019 Of Kandappan Hamza v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (International Taxation)
Date of order
18 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/1561/2019 Of Kandappan Hamza v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (International Taxation), the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
FRIDAY ,THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 28TH POUSHA, 1940
WP(C).No. 1561 of 2019
PETITIONER:
KANDAPPAN HAMZA,KP 11/377,KANDAPPAN HOUSE ANCHACHAVADI,KALIKAVU, MALAPPURAM, KERALA
BY ADVS.SRI.M.P.SHAMEEM AHAMEDSRI.CYRIAC TOM
RESPONDENTS:
1DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDINGI.S.PRESS ROAD, KOCHI 682 0182COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)KOCHI CIRCLE,CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDINGI.S.PRESS ROAD KOCHI 682 018
SC SRI. JOSE JOSEPH.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, an assessee, has the Ext. P2 appeal pending
before the 2[nd] respondent. Seeking its early disposal, the petitionerhas filed this Writ Petition.
2.
In response to the submissions made by the petitioner's
counsel, the learned Standing Counsel for the revenue assures theCourt that the 2[nd] respondent will endeavour to dispose of thestatutory appeal expeditiously.
Under these circumstances, without adverting to the merits, I
dispose of the Writ Petition, holding that the 2[nd] respondent willconsider the petitioner's Ext.P2 appeal, possibly in three months.
Sd/-
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
JUDGE
sd
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.