Wp(C)/15679/2018 Of Abdul Majeed v. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
18 Jun 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/15679/2018 Of Abdul Majeed v. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
18 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp(C)/15679/2018 Of Abdul Majeed v. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE 2018 / 28TH JYAISHTA, 1940
WP(C).No. 15679 of 2018
PETITIONER(S)
ABDUL MAJEED
AGED 48 YEARS,
S/O. MUHAMMED,
MOOSARUKANDI HOUSE
KIZHAKKOTH.P.O.
PANOOR, KODUVALLY,
KOZHIKODE,
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.MH 5,
4TH MAIN, 4TH CROSS,
BANNIMANTAP C LAYOUT, MYSORE BY ADVS.SRI.C.P.MOHAMMED NIAS SMT.V.NAMITHA
BY ADVS.SRI.C.P.MOHAMMED NIAS
RESPONDENT(S):
1. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE-1, AAYAKAR BHAVAN KOZHIKODE- 673 0012. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(3) AYAKAR BHAVAN, KOZHIKODE- 673 001
BY SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18-06-2018,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RENT AGREEMENT DATED 6.10.2016EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE CHITTY PRIZE MONEY PAYMENT VOUCHER DATED 7.7.2017EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT OF THE PETITIONER'S FATHER IN LAW FROM 30.5.2017 TO 7.11.2017EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE CHITTY PRIZE MONEY PAYMENT VOUCHER DATED 7.7.2017EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT OF THE PETITIONER'S FATHER IN LAW FROM 30.5.2017 TO 7.11.2017
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE CHITTY PRIZE MONEY PAYMENT VOUCHER DATED 11.9.2017 VOUCHER DATED 11.9.2017
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT OF THE PETITIONER'S FATHER IN LAW FROM 11.9.2017 TO 6.11.2017EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE PASSBOOK OF KOZHIKODE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK, NARIKUNIEXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT OF THE PETITIONER FOR THE PERIOD FROM 1.11.2016 TO 8.3.2018 WITH RESPECT TO HIS ACCOUNT AT CANARA BANK, ELETTILEXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.804/2017 DATED 2.11.2017 BEFORE THE SULTHANBATHERY POLICE STATIONEXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON ORDER DATED 16.12.2017 IN CMP NO 7368/2017 AND CMP 7163/2017 PETITIONER'S FATHER IN LAW FROM 11.9.2017 TO 6.11.2017EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE PASSBOOK OF KOZHIKODE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK, NARIKUNIEXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT OF THE PETITIONER FOR THE PERIOD FROM 1.11.2016 TO 8.3.2018 WITH RESPECT TO HIS ACCOUNT AT CANARA BANK, ELETTILEXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.804/2017 DATED 2.11.2017 BEFORE THE SULTHANBATHERY POLICE STATIONEXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON ORDER DATED 16.12.2017 IN CMP NO 7368/2017 AND CMP 7163/2017
EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 6.2.2018 OF THE RESPONDENTEXHIBIT P11 TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 6.2.2018EXHIBIT P12 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 10.4.2018 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 221(1) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 RESPONDENTEXHIBIT P11 TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 6.2.2018EXHIBIT P12 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 10.4.2018 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 221(1) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:NIL
rsr
//TRUE COPY//
SD/-
PA TO JUDGE
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
--------------------------------------------
W.P.(C).No.15679 of 2018
---------------------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 18[th] day of June, 2018
J U D G M E N T
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:NIL
rsr
//TRUE COPY//
SD/-
PA TO JUDGE
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
--------------------------------------------
W.P.(C).No.15679 of 2018
---------------------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 18[th] day of June, 2018
J U D G M E N T
Ext.P10 order, which is under challenge in thewrit petition, is appealable under the Income Tax Act.Exceptional reasons on which this Court would entertainthe writ petition even when the party has a right of appealunder the statute have not been made out by thepetitioner. The writ petition, in the circumstances, isdismissed, without prejudice to the right of the petitionerto challenge the impugned order in appeal under theIncome Tax Act.
rsr
Sd/- P.B.SURESH KUMAR JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.