Wp(C)/15809/2023 Of New Year Kuries Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Assessment Unit
High Court
31 May 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/15809/2023 Of New Year Kuries Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Assessment Unit
Date of order
31 May 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/15809/2023 Of New Year Kuries Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Assessment Unit, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
WEDNESDAY, THE 31 DAY OF MAY 2023 / 10TH JYAISHTA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 15809 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 31[st] day of May, 2023
The writ petition is filed interalia, to direct therespondents 1 and 2 to refrain from proceedingwith recovery proceedings pursuant to Ext.P1assessment order.
2. When the matter was taken up forconsideration today, the learned counsel for thepetitioner submitted that the petitioner will besatisfied if a direction is issued to the secondrespondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P3 staypetition, which is filed in Ext.P2 appeal,expeditiously.
3. The petitioner’s case is that, challengingExt.P1 assessment order, the petitioner haspreferred Ext.P2 appeal and Ext.P3 stay petitionbefore the second respondent. Despite Ext.P3stay petition pending consideration since
01.04.2023, the second respondent has not taken
action on the same. The petitioner isapprehensive that the respondents may enforceExt.P1 order. Hence, the writ petition.
4. Heard; Sri.Alan Priyadarshi Dev, the
learned counsel appearing for the petitioner andSri. Jose Joseph, the learned counsel appearingfor the respondents.
Having considered the pleadings and
materials on record and taking note of thesubmission made by the learned counselappearing for the petitioner, I deem it appropriateto dispose of the writ petition in the followingmanner:
(i) The second respondent is directed to
consider and dispose of Ext.P3 stay petition inaccordance with law and as expeditiously aspossible, at any rate, within a period of fourmonths from the date of receipt of a certified
WPC No.15809 of 2023
copy of this judgment after affording thepetitioner an opportunity of being heard.
(ii) Needless to mention, if the secondrespondent proposes to pass a conditional orderof stay, he shall state reasons for the same.
(iii) Until such time as orders are passed onExt.P3 stay petition, all further proceedingspursuant to Ext.P1 order shall be kept inabeyance.
SKP/31-05
Sd/-
C. S. DIASJUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 15809/2023
PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS:EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY THEFIRST RESPONDENT DATED 28.12.2022EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DATED 21.01.2023 FILED BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENTEXHIBIT-P3TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 01.04.2023FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENTEXHIBIT-P4TRUE COPY OF STAY APPLICATION FILED BEFORE THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CALICUT DATED 27.01.2023
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:NIL
TRUE COPY
P.A.TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.