Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/15922/2021 Of Shamsudheen.t.r v. T...

Wp(C)/15922/2021 Of Shamsudheen.t.r v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)

High Court 06 Aug 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/15922/2021 Of Shamsudheen.t.r v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
06 Aug 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/15922/2021 Of Shamsudheen.t.r v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Decision: In this view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the concerned respondent to decide the appeal (Ext.P2)challenging the assessment order, within a period of four months WP(C) NO.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BADAR FRIDAY, THE 6 DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 15TH SRAVANA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 15922 OF 2021 PETITIONER/S: SHAMSUDHEEN.T.R., S/O. RAHEEM, THOPPITHODI HOUSE, CHEROOR. P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT/S: 1THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)AYAKAR BHAVAN, ERNAKULAM, PIN -682 018 2THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), KOCHI, PIN – 682 018SRI. CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, STANDING COUNSEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON06.08.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 15922 OF 2021 2 JUDGMENT Heard both sides. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has challenged the assessment order for the year2015-16 by filing an appeal in the year 2018. He submits that theappeal is pending right from the year 2018. Therefore, therespondents be directed to decide the appeal within a time boundmanner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that if the appeal is pending, then the same can be directedto be decided within a period of six months. 4.However, the learned counsel appearing for the petitionersubmits that the appeal is of the year 2018 and it needs to bedisposed of expeditiously. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the concerned respondent to decide the appeal (Ext.P2)challenging the assessment order, within a period of four months WP(C) NO. 15922 OF 2021 3 from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner to cooperate with the respondents in expeditious disposal of theappeal. The parties to act upon the authenticated copy of thisjudgment. SD/- ajt A.M.BADAR JUDGE WP(C) NO. 15922 OF 2021 4 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS APPENDIX OF 15922 OF 2021 EXHIBIT P1 – TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2015-16 ISSUED BY THEASSESSING OFFICER DATED 31.12.2017EXHIBIT P2 – TRUE COPY OF THE STATUTORY APPEAL PREFERRED AGAINST EXT.P1 ASSESSMENTORDER FOR THE PERIOD 2015-16 BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED27.01.2018
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan