Wp(C)/16075/2013 Of M/S Gospel For Asia v. The Income Tax Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE 2013/5TH ASHADHA, 1935 WP(C).No. 16075 of 2013 (H) ---------------------------- PETITIONER : ---------- M/S GOSPEL FOR ASIA P.O. BOX 4, MANJADI JUNCTION.P.O. THIRUVALLA-689105. REP. BY TRUSTEE DR. SINY PUNNOOSE. BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL D. NAIR SMT.NIVEDITA A.KAMATH SRI.R.SREEJITH RESPONDENTS : ----------- 1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER OFFICE OF THE ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX WARD-1, THIRUVALLA. WARD-1, THIRUVALLA. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)-1, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, TRIVANDRUM-695003. AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, TRIVANDRUM-695003. R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.JOSE JOSEPH BP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26-06-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 16075 of 2013 (H) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ---------------------- EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 28-3-13 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT. TO THE PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE US/ 220(1) ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL. ----------------------- //TRUE COPY// BP P.A. TO JDUGE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(c) No.16075 OF 2013 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 26[th] day of June, 2013 JUDGMENT Being aggrieved of Ext.P1 order of assessment, the petitioner haspreferred Ext.P2 appeal along with Ext.P3 petition for stay, which arepending consideration before the second respondent. 2.The case of the petitioner is that without any regard to thependency of the above proceedings, Ext.P4 notice was issued whichmade the petitioner to approach this Court with the present writ petition. 3.Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 4.Considering the facts and circumstances, the writ petition isdisposed of, directing the second respondent to consider Ext.P3 petitionfor stay and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law, asexpeditiously as possible, at any rate within 'one month' from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment. Coercive proceedings pursuant toExt.P4 shall be kept in abeyance till such time. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the second respondent for further steps. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENONJUDGE