Wp(C)/16154/2016 Of Pulamanthole Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Of Income Tax

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF APRIL 2016/9TH VAISAKHA, 1938 WP(C).No. 16154 of 2016 (T) ------------------------------------------- NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE PETITIONER(S) : ---------------------------------------------------------------------- PULAMANTHOLE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED NO.F.1565, PULAMANTHOLE P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679 323, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE RESPONDENT(S) : ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), AYAKAR BHAVAN, KOZHIKODE-673 001. 2. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD(4), TIRUR-676 101. BY ADV. SRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-04-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Msd. WP(C).No. 16154 of 2016 (T) ------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS : P1 COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 23.02.2016 ISSUED BYTHE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE PERIOD 2013-14. P2 COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 15.03.2016 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE PERIOD 2013-14. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE. Msd. A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J. ------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C).No. 16154 of 2016------------------------------------------------Dated this the 29[th] day of April, 2016 JUDGMENT The petitioner, as against assessment order for the year 2013-14, has preferred an appeal. In view of the above, the appellate authority is directed to consider the appeal within a period of fourmonths after issuing notice to the petitioner. Till a decision is taken, all recovery proceedings based on assessmentorder shall be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE bpr