Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/16171/2016 Of The Pattikkad Servic...

Wp(C)/16171/2016 Of The Pattikkad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissionr Of Income Tax

High Court 29 Apr 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/16171/2016 Of The Pattikkad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissionr Of Income Tax
Date of order
29 Apr 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/16171/2016 Of The Pattikkad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissionr Of Income Tax, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF APRIL 2016/9TH VAISAKHA, 1938 WP(C).No. 16171 of 2016 (V) ---------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------- THE PATTIKKAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED NO.P 455, PATTIKKAD P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679 325, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT(S):-------------- 1.THE COMMISSIONR OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) AYAKAR BHAVAN, KOZHIKODE - 673 001. 2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD (4), TIRUR - 676 101. BY SRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-04-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: mbr/ --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS: ----------------------- P1 : COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 7.1.2015 ISSUED BY THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OP. SOCIETIES (GENERAL), MALAPPURAM.JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OP. SOCIETIES (GENERAL), MALAPPURAM. P2 : COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 23.2.2016 ISSUED BYTHE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE PERIOD 2013-14.THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE PERIOD 2013-14. P3 : COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 15.03.2016 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE PERIOD 2013-14. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:NIL ----------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/ A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J. ------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C).No. 16171 of 2016 ------------------------------------------------Dated this the 29[th] day of April, 2016 JUDGMENT The petitioner, as against assessment order for the year 2013-14, has preferred an appeal. In view of the above, the appellate authority is directed to consider the appeal within a period of fourmonths after issuing notice to the petitioner. Till a decision is taken, all coercive steps shall be deferred to recover the amount due under the assessment order. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE bpr
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan