Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/16213/2007 Of P.premkumar v. Assis...

Wp(C)/16213/2007 Of P.premkumar v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 29 May 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/16213/2007 Of P.premkumar v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
29 May 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/16213/2007 Of P.premkumar v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 29TH MAY 2007 / 8TH JYAISHTA 1929 WP(C).No. 16213 of 2007(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ P.PREMKUMAR, `LAKSHMI', K.K.VISWANATHAN ROAD, KARUVELIPADY, COCHIN-5. BY ADV. SRI.K.I.MAYANKUTTY MATHER SMT.S.LAKSHMY RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, ERNAKULAM. 2. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) I, KOCHI. 3. TAX RECOVERY OFFICER, RANGE I, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-18. BY ADV. SHRI. GEORGE K GEORGE, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/05/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ----------------------------------- WP(C) No. 16213 of 2007 ------------------------- Dated, this the 29[th] day of May, 2007 J U D G M E N T Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned StandingCounsel for the Income Tax Department. Since appeal is pendingbefore the Tribunal and having regard to the contentions raised,there will be stay against recovery of balance tax with interest dueas per the impugned order during pendency of the appeal onpetitioner remitting Rs. 35 lakhs in two installments, firstinstallment of Rs. 20 lakhs will be paid on or before 30/06/2007 andbalance Rs. 15 lakhs will be paid on or before 31/07/2007. Tribunalwill take up the appeals and dispose of the same within four monthsfrom now. If petitioner does not make payment as above, recoveryproceedings can be continued for recovering entire arrears. This WP(C) is disposed of as above. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan