Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/16564/2016 Of The Kidangoor Servic...

Wp(C)/16564/2016 Of The Kidangoor Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)

High Court 29 Apr 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/16564/2016 Of The Kidangoor Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
29 Apr 2016
Assessment year(s)
2008-09
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/16564/2016 Of The Kidangoor Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF APRIL 2016/9TH VAISAKHA, 1938 WP(C).No. 16564 of 2016 (U) --------------------------------------------- NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE PETITIONER(S): --------------------------------------------------------------------- THE KIDANGOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.3431, KIDANGOOR P.O., KIDANGOOR, KOTTAYAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), AYAKAR BHAVAN, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD (4), KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, S.C THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-04-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Msd. WP(C).No. 16564 of 2016 (U) ------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS : EXHIBIT P1: COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 23.02.2016 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2: COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 15.03.2016 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE. Msd. A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 16564 of 2016 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 29[th] day of April 2016 JUDGMENT Against Ext. P1 assessment orders for the assessment year2008-09, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 appeal before the 1[st]respondent. 2. Heard both sides 3. In view of the above, the 1[st] respondent is directed toconsider and pass orders on Ext.P2 appeal within a period of fourmonths from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, afterhearing the petitioner. Recovery steps for recovery of amountsconfirmed against petitioner by Ext.P1 assessment order shall bekept in abeyance till orders are passed by the 1[st] respondent asdirected above. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan