Wp(C)/16583/2016 Of The Thachinganalam Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
High Court
29 Apr 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/16583/2016 Of The Thachinganalam Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
29 Apr 2016
Assessment year(s)
2008-09
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/16583/2016 Of The Thachinganalam Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF APRIL 2016/9TH VAISAKHA, 1938
WP(C).No. 16583 of 2016 (W)
----------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
-----------------------
THE THACHINGANALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED NO.10152,THACHINGANADAM P.O., PATTIKKAD VIA,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 679 325,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS.
RESPONDENT(S):---------------------------
BY ADV. SRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI, SC.
rs.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-04-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 16583 of 2016 (W)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:-
P1 COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DTD. 07.01.2014 ISSUED BY THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OP. SOCIETIES (GENERAL), MALAPPURAM.
P2 COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DTD. 23.02.2016 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
P3 COPY OF THE APPEAL DTD. 15.03.2016 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
P4 COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DTD. 15.03.2016 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:-
NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.S. TO JUDGE
rs.
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
W.P.(C) No.16583 of 2016
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dated this the 29[th] day of April 2016
JUDGMENT
Against Ext. P2 assessment order for the assessment year2008-09, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P3 appeal and Ext.P4stay petition before the 1[st] respondent. It is the case of thepetitioner that even prior to considering the stay petition, recoverysteps are sought to be pursued for recovery of the amountsconfirmed by Ext. P2 assessment order.
2. Heard both sides.
3. In view of the above, the 1[st] respondent is directed toconsider and pass orders on Ext.P3 appeal within a period of fourmonths from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, afterhearing the petitioner. Recovery steps for recovery of amountsconfirmed against petitioner by Ext.P2 assessment order shall bekept in abeyance till orders are passed by the 1[st] respondent asdirected above.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.