Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/16626/2018 Of Sitikantha Mohapatra...

Wp(C)/16626/2018 Of Sitikantha Mohapatra v. Commissioner Income Tax(Appeals)

High Court 28 Nov 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Wp(C)/16626/2018 Of Sitikantha Mohapatra v. Commissioner Income Tax(Appeals)
Date of order
28 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/16626/2018 Of Sitikantha Mohapatra v. Commissioner Income Tax(Appeals), the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
02. 28.11.2018 MP Shri R. Chimanka, learned Sr. Standing counsel for Income Tax and Shri A. Kedia, learned Jr. Standing Counsel for Income Tax enter appearance for the opposite parties and file appearance memo in Court today, which is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction to opposite party no.1 to dispose of the appeal under Annexure-2, i.e. I.T. No.340/13-14 within a stipulated period. Considering the limited nature of prayer and without expressing any opinion of the merits of the case, it is directed that in the event the petitioner files an application before the appellate authority for expeditious disposal of I.T. No.340/13-14, the appellate authority shall consider and dispose of the same within three months from the date of filing of the application by the petitioner. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules. .…….......……………… ( K.S. Jhaveri ) Chief Justice …………………..……… (K. R. Mohapatra) Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan