Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/16667/2014 Of K.zameer v. The Inco...

Wp(C)/16667/2014 Of K.zameer v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(4), Kozhikode

High Court 01 Jul 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/16667/2014 Of K.zameer v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(4), Kozhikode
Date of order
01 Jul 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/16667/2014 Of K.zameer v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(4), Kozhikode, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Decision: The Writ Petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JULY 2014/10TH ASHADHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 16667 of 2014 (G) ---------------------------- PETITIONER : --------------------- K. ZAMEER KOROKKARAN HOUSE, CHETTAPALAM, MANANTHAVADY WAYANAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.N.DAMODARAN NAMBOOTHIRI RESPONDENT(S) : ---------------------------- 1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(4), O/O THE ADDL.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE-I, AYKAR BHAVAN, KOZHIKODE-673001. RANGE-I, AYKAR BHAVAN, KOZHIKODE-673001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-I O/O.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AAYAKAR BHAVAN NORTH BLOCK, KOZHIKODE-673001. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-07-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn WP(C).No. 16667 of 2014 (G) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :------------------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1: TRUE COPY OF THE PENALTY ORDER NO.Z-701/W-1(4)/KKD/2003-04, DATED 29.07.2003 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.DATED 29.07.2003 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT-P2: TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO.Z-701 DATED 31.12.2007ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT-P3: TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL AGAINST THE PENALTY ORDER DATED 10.12.2003 FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.10.12.2003 FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P4: TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL AGAINST THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED24.01.2008 FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.24.01.2008 FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P5: TRUE COPY OF THE POSTING NOTICE NO.ITA-47/R1/CLT/CIT/03-04 DATED 05.12.2011, ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.DATED 05.12.2011, ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT-P5A: TRUE COPY OF THE POSTING NOTICE DATED 30.01.2012 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT-P5B: TRUE COPY OF THE POSTING NOTICE 01.03.2012 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL ------------------------------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J. ===================== W.P.(C) No. 16667 of 2014======================Dated this the 1[st] day of July, 2014 J U D G M E N T The only prayer of the petitioner is to dispose of thefirst appeal, which has been filed respectively on thepenalty and assessment orders for the assessment years1994-95, in the year 2003 and 2008. It is only proper thatthe respondent consider the same expeditiously with noticeto the petitioner, and dispose of the same, if not alreadydone, within three months from today. The Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN,JUDGE SB // True Copy // P.A To Judge. Crl.R.P. No. 5751/2013
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan