Wp(C)/16757/2011 Of M.j. Lawrence v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
12 Jul 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/16757/2011 Of M.j. Lawrence v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
12 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/16757/2011 Of M.j. Lawrence v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
TUESDAY, THE 12TH JULY 2011 / 21ST ASHADHA 1933
WP(C).No. 16757 of 2011(T)
--------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
-----------------------
M.J. LAWRENCE,
MADATHIPARAMBIL (KADAMATTUPARAMBIL)
MARADU PO, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN 682 304.
BY ADVS. SRI.ANIL D. NAIR
SRI.J.R.PREM NAVAZ
SMT.NIVEDITA A.KAMATH
RESPONDENT(S):
-----------------------
1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, ERNAKULAM - 682018
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)
ERNAKULAM - 682018
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI.C.K. GOVINDAN.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 12/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 16757 of 2011
APPENDIX:
S. SIRI JAGAN, J.
-------------------------------------------------
W.P.(C)No. 16757 OF 2011
-------------------------------------------------
DATED THIS THE 12[th] DAY OF JULY, 2011
J U D G M E N T
Against Ext.P1 assessment order petitioner filed Ext.P2appeal before the 2[nd] respondent along with Ext.P3 stay petition.Petitioner also filed Ext.P4 rectification application before the 1[st]respondent in respect of certain alleged mistakes in theassessment order. Petitioner's grievance in this writ petition isthat Ext.P4 application for rectification is not being consideredby the 1[st] respondent. Petitioner also seeks disposal of Ext.P3stay petition filed by the petitioner before the 2[nd] respondent.
2.Learned Standing Counsel for the Income TaxDepartment points out that as per the rules the Department hastime till 31-07-2011 to dispose of the application for rectification.
3.Having heard both sides I dispose of the writ petitionwith the following directions:
The 1[st] respondent shall consider and pass orders on Ext.P4application for rectification as expeditiously as possible at anyrate before 31-07-2011. The 2[nd] respondent shall consider andpass orders on Ext.P3 stay petition as expeditiously as possible,
W.P.(C)No. 16757/2011
at any rate within one month from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis judgment. Till orders are passed on Ext.P3 the recoveryproceedings shall be kept in abeyance.
Sd/-S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE.
AMG
True copy
P.A to Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.