Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/17219/2014 Of Suresh Velayudhan v....

Wp(C)/17219/2014 Of Suresh Velayudhan v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(3), Thiruvananthapuram

High Court 07 Jul 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/17219/2014 Of Suresh Velayudhan v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(3), Thiruvananthapuram
Date of order
07 Jul 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/17219/2014 Of Suresh Velayudhan v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(3), Thiruvananthapuram, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JULY 2014/16TH ASHADHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 17219 of 2014 (B) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):-------------- SHRI.SURESH VELAYUDHAN, PROPRIETOR, M/S.PARAMOUNT PHOTOGRAPHERS, M.G.ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. BY ADVS.SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SR.) SRI.M.B.PRAJITH SRI.V.P.NARAYANAN SMT.DIVYA RAVINDRAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------- 1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 003. 2.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, TRIVANDRUM -695 003. BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-07-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :----------------------- RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: ----------------------- NIL. /true copy/ rvs/ P.A.TO JUDGE K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J. ===================== W.P.(C) No. 17219 of 2014======================Dated this the 7[th] day of July, 2014 J U D G M E N T The petitioner seeks for expeditious consideration ofExt.P4, rectification application filed before the AssessingOfficer. In fact, even going by the averments of thepetitioner, the Appellate Authority had, pursuant to thedirections issued by this Court in Ext.P6, considered thecase of the petitioner for stay and directed payment of 20%of the demand raised, that too in instalments. Thepetitioner seems to have complied with the order also. Thepetitioner seeks now expeditious consideration of therectification application. No case is made out to pass apositive direction especially since the rectificationapplication has been filed on 31.03.2014. The petitionercould always approach the authority for such expeditiousconsideration. The Writ Petition is closed. Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB // True Copy // P.A To Judge.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan