Wp(C)/17678/2015 Of Ettumanoor Service Co-Operative Bank v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
High Court
16 Jan 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/17678/2015 Of Ettumanoor Service Co-Operative Bank v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
16 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp(C)/17678/2015 Of Ettumanoor Service Co-Operative Bank v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In the lightof the submission made by the learned counsel for thepetitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 2018 / 26TH POUSHA, 1939
WP(C).No. 17678 of 2015 (H)
PETITIONER
ETTUMANOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK NO.4069,
EROOR ROAD, ETTUMANOOR, KOTTAYAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.A.KUMAR
SMT G.MINI.
RESPONDENTS
1COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),KOTTAYAM 686 001.
2INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD NO.V, OFFICE OF ADDL/JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
PUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDING, SHASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM 686 001.
R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-01-2018,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Hr...
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1:TRUE COPY OF THE CERTFICATE ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES.
EXHIBIT P2:TRUE COPY OF THE BYE LAWS.
EXHIBIT P3:TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 13.03.2015.
EXHIBIT P4:TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DATED 14.04.2015.
EXHIBIT P5:TRUE COPY OF THE SAID COMMUNICATION DATED 05.05.2015.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS
NIL
// TRUE COPY// P.S TO JUDGE
Hr....
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = =
W.P.(C).No.17678 of 2015.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Dated this the 16[th] day of January, 2018
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitsthat the writ petition has become infructuous. In the lightof the submission made by the learned counsel for thepetitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.
Kvs/-
// true copy //
PS TO JUDGE.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.