Wp(C)/17757/2022 Of Thrissur District Co-Operative Society Ltd v. The Additional / Joint / Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
01 Jun 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/17757/2022 Of Thrissur District Co-Operative Society Ltd v. The Additional / Joint / Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
01 Jun 2022
Assessment year(s)
2016-17
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/17757/2022 Of Thrissur District Co-Operative Society Ltd v. The Additional / Joint / Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above. sd/- GOPINATH P.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
WEDNESDAY, THE 1 DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 11TH JYAISHTA, 1944WP(C) NO. 17757 OF 2022
PETITIONER/S:
THRISSUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.ACP OFFICE THRISSUR P. O., THRISSUR, KERALA - 680 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY SHEENA M. S.
BY ADVS.ANIL D. NAIRTELMA RAJUP.K.BIJUEDATHARA VINEETA KRISHNAN
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE ADDITIONAL / JOINT / ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
INCOME TAX OFFICER, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRENEW DELHI - 110001.2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, NEW DELHI - 110001.SRI. JOSE JOSEPH, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON01.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Aggrieved by ExT.P1 order of assessment relating toassessment year 2016-17, petitioner has preferred an appealbefore the 2[nd] respondent, a copy of which is produced asExt.P2. A petition for stay of proceedings pursuant to theassessment order has also been filed as Ext.P3. Petitionerapprehends coercive proceedings even before the petition forstay is considered. Hence, this writ petition.
2. Having considered the submissions of the counsel forthe petitioner as well as the respondents, I am of the opinionthat this writ petition itself can be disposed with a direction.
3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 2[nd]respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 stay petition,within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copyof this judgment. Till such a decision is taken, all coerciveproceedings against the petitioner in respect of Ext.P1 shall bekept in abeyance.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
sd/-
GOPINATH P.
JUDGE
WP(C) NO. 17757 OF 2022 3
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 17757/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1TRUE COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 26.03.2022 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2016-17 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER.
Exhibit P2
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P3
TRUE COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P4
TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT RECEIPT ACKNOWLEDGING THE FILING OF THE APPEAL BEFORETHE 2ND RESPONDENT.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.