Case Law › High Court › Wp(C)/17804/2008 Of K.ahammed Sahib v. A...

Wp(C)/17804/2008 Of K.ahammed Sahib v. Agrl.income Tax & Commercial Tax Officer

High Court 13 Jun 2008 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

13 Jun 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/17804/2008 Of K.ahammed Sahib v. Agrl.income Tax & Commercial Tax Officer, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of directing the third respondent toconsider and take a decision on Ext.P3 stay petition in accordance with lawwithin a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of thisjudgment.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 13TH JUNE 2008 / 23RD JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 17804 of 2008(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ K. AHAMMED SAHIB,MINI TRADERS,COURT ROAD, ALATHUR,PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.N.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR SRI.V.K.SHAMUSUDHEEN RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. AGRL. INCOME TAX & COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, ALATHUR. ALATHUR. 2. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER (AA), COMMERCIAL TAXES, PALAKKAD. COMMERCIAL TAXES, PALAKKAD. 3. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM. COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM. 4. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR), ALATHUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. ALATHUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. C.K. GOVINDAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -WP.(C) No.17804 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Dated this the 13th day of June, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner seeks a direction to pass orders on Exts.P2 to P4 and to direct the respondents not to take any steps to recover the amount dueunder Ext.P1 order and demanded under Exts.P5 and P6 notices. Petitionerhas preferred Ext.P2 appeal accompanied by Ext.P3 stay petition. 2. I heard learned Government Pleader also. The writ petition is disposed of directing the third respondent toconsider and take a decision on Ext.P3 stay petition in accordance with lawwithin a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of thisjudgment. Proceedings pursuant to Exts.P5 and P6 will be kept in abeyancetill a decision is taken as aforesaid. Petitioner will produce a copy of thisjudgment immediately on receipt of the same before the third respondent. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.