Case LawHigh Court › W.p.(C)/17933/2024 Of Nivedan Bharadwaj...

W.p.(C)/17933/2024 Of Nivedan Bharadwaj v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-19, Delhi & Ors

High Court 24 Dec 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
W.p.(C)/17933/2024 Of Nivedan Bharadwaj v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-19, Delhi & Ors
Date of order
24 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
2015-16, 2024-25
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In W.p.(C)/17933/2024 Of Nivedan Bharadwaj v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-19, Delhi & Ors, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 5.The petition is allowed in the aforesaid terms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~20. *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+W.P.(C) 17933/2024 CM APPL. 76272/2024 CM APPL. 76273/2024NIVEDAN BHARADWAJ % CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAO R D E R24.12.2024 1.The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning the noticedated 15.09.2023 (hereafter the impugned notice) under Section 153C of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter the Act) as well as the notice under Section142(1) of the Act, inter alia, on the ground that the impugned notice isbarred by limitation. The impugned notice was issued on 15.09.2023 inrespect of assessment year 2015-16. 2.The learned counsel appearing for the Revenue fairly states that thecontentions advanced by the petitioner are correct and the impugned noticeis beyond the period of limitation. 3.The satisfaction note of the Assessing Officer for searched person wasrecorded on 23.08.2023, which is relevant to the assessment year 2024-25. The petitioner has set out a tabular statement in his objections to theimpugned notice indicating the block of six years in respect of whichassessments could be re-opened under Section 153C of the Act. The saidtabular statement is set out below: “ ” 4.The learned counsel for the Revenue concurs with the abovesubmissions. Accordingly, the impugned notice is set aside. 5.The petition is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Pending applicationsalso stand disposed of. VIBHU BAKHRU, ACJ DECEMBER 24, 2024N.Khanna TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan