Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/18608/2020 Of The Kollad Service C...

Wp(C)/18608/2020 Of The Kollad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)

High Court 11 Sep 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/18608/2020 Of The Kollad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)
Date of order
11 Sep 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/18608/2020 Of The Kollad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals), the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2020 / 20TH BHADRA, 1942 WP(C).No.18608 OF 2020(A) PETITIONER: THE KOLLAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANKLTD.NO.1830,KOLLAD P.O.,KOTTAYAM DISTRICT,REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENTS: 1THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS),AYAKAR BHAVAN,KOTTAYAM PIN 686 001. 2THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD NO.2,KOTTAYAM PIN 686 001. BY SRI JOSE JOSEPH, SC FOR INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON11.09.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Dated this the 11[th] day of September, 2020 The petitioner is a Co-operative bank. The petitioner furnished income tax returns for the assessment year 1919- 2020 and claimed the benefit under Section 80P(4) of theIncome Tax Act. The Assessing Authority completed theassessment and demanded a tax of `66,38,680/- bydisallowing claim for deduction under Section 80P(2) of theIncome Tax Act. 2.The petitioner has filed Ext.P2 appeal before theCommissioner of Income Tax Appeals, Kottayam. Pendingthe appeal, coercive steps are being taken against thepetitioner, contends the learned counsel for the petitioner.3.Heard. 4.The statutory appeal filed by the petitioner ispending. Before considering the same on merits if coercivesteps are taken against the petitioner, the petitioner will be put to untold difficulties. In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed ofdirecting the first respondent to consider Ext.P2 appeal filedby the petitioner on merits and pass appropriate ordersthereon. Till Ext.P2 is considered and disposed of, therespondents are restrained from taking coercive actionagainst the petitioner. The appeal shall be considered anddisposed of within a period of six months. ncd Sd/- N. NAGARESH JUDGE APPENDIX EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDING 13.07.2020N ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 22.08.2020FILED BY THE PETITIONER SOCIETY BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan