Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/18677/2024 Of Muhammed Ali P.p v....

Wp(C)/18677/2024 Of Muhammed Ali P.p v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 28 May 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/18677/2024 Of Muhammed Ali P.p v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
28 May 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/18677/2024 Of Muhammed Ali P.p v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of with the abovedirection.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN TUESDAY, THE 28 DAY OF MAY 2024 / 7TH JYAISHTA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 18677 OF 2024 PETITIONER/S: MUHAMMED ALI P.PAGED 62 YEARSA-11A BENZEER MANZIL , KUTTOOR POST AR NAGAR , MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676305BY ADVS.P.RAGHUNATHANPREMJIT NAGENDRANRISHAL.KSAIJESH A. RESPONDENTS: 1ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL CIRCLE, AAYAKKAR BHAVAN, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE,PIN - 673001CENTRAL CIRCLE, AAYAKKAR BHAVAN, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE,PIN - 673001 2ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE , AAYAKKAR BHAVAN, KOCHI, PIN - 6820183COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -3C.R BUILDING , I.S PRESS ROAD , ERNAKULAM, PIN – 682018C.R BUILDING , I.S PRESS ROAD , ERNAKULAM, PIN – 682018 BY SC SRI. NAVANEETH N.NATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FORADMISSION ON 28.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP.C 18677/2024 JUDGMENT Against Exts. P2 to P4 assessment orders for the assessment years 2015-2016, 2016-2017 and 2017-2018, the petitioner had preferred Exts. P5 toP7 appeals and Exts.P8 to P10 stay petitions before the 3[rd] respondent appellate authority. The grievance ofthe petitioner is that, during the pendency of theappeals, steps have been taken for recovery of theamounts due as per the assessment orders. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for the respondents. Since Exts.P2 to P4 are statutory appeals, there will be a direction to the 3[rd] respondent to considerExts.P8 to P10 stay petitions, as expeditiously aspossible, at any rate, within a period of two monthsfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till WP.C 18677/2024 such time, orders are passed on Exts.P8 to P10, all recovery proceedings pursuant to Exts.P2 to P4 assessment orders shall be deferred. The writ petition is disposed of with the abovedirection. Sd/- MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE al/- WP.C 18677/2024 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 18677/2024
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan