Wp(C)/18677/2024 Of Muhammed Ali P.p v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
28 May 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/18677/2024 Of Muhammed Ali P.p v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
28 May 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/18677/2024 Of Muhammed Ali P.p v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of with the abovedirection.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
TUESDAY, THE 28 DAY OF MAY 2024 / 7TH JYAISHTA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 18677 OF 2024
PETITIONER/S:
MUHAMMED ALI P.PAGED 62 YEARSA-11A BENZEER MANZIL , KUTTOOR POST AR NAGAR , MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676305BY ADVS.P.RAGHUNATHANPREMJIT NAGENDRANRISHAL.KSAIJESH A.
RESPONDENTS:
1ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL CIRCLE, AAYAKKAR BHAVAN, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE,PIN - 673001CENTRAL CIRCLE, AAYAKKAR BHAVAN, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE,PIN - 673001
2ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
CENTRAL CIRCLE , AAYAKKAR BHAVAN, KOCHI, PIN - 6820183COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -3C.R BUILDING , I.S PRESS ROAD , ERNAKULAM, PIN – 682018C.R BUILDING , I.S PRESS ROAD , ERNAKULAM, PIN – 682018
BY SC SRI. NAVANEETH N.NATH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FORADMISSION ON 28.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP.C 18677/2024
JUDGMENT
Against Exts. P2 to P4 assessment orders for
the assessment years 2015-2016, 2016-2017 and
2017-2018, the petitioner had preferred Exts. P5 toP7 appeals and Exts.P8 to P10 stay petitions before the
3[rd] respondent appellate authority. The grievance ofthe petitioner is that, during the pendency of theappeals, steps have been taken for recovery of theamounts due as per the assessment orders.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned standing counsel for the respondents.
Since Exts.P2 to P4 are statutory appeals, there
will be a direction to the 3[rd] respondent to considerExts.P8 to P10 stay petitions, as expeditiously aspossible, at any rate, within a period of two monthsfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till
WP.C 18677/2024
such time, orders are passed on Exts.P8 to P10, all
recovery proceedings pursuant to Exts.P2 to P4
assessment orders shall be deferred.
The writ petition is disposed of with the abovedirection.
Sd/-
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
JUDGE
al/-
WP.C 18677/2024
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 18677/2024
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.