Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/18724/2014 Of Dr.hannah John v. Th...

Wp(C)/18724/2014 Of Dr.hannah John v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(4)Thiruvananthapuram

High Court 22 Jul 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/18724/2014 Of Dr.hannah John v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(4)Thiruvananthapuram
Date of order
22 Jul 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/18724/2014 Of Dr.hannah John v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(4)Thiruvananthapuram, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JULY 2014/31ST ASHADHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 18724 of 2014 (M) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):------------- DR.HANNAH JOHN, AGED 36 YEARS, W/O JOHN JOSEPH, LANE A.T.C. 2/3310-3, CHALAKUZHY ROAD, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPRUAM- 695 004. BY ADV. SRI.N.JAMES KOSHY. RESPONDENT(S): ------------- 1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(4), OFFICE OF THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,RANGE I, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-07-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:----------------------- NIL./true copy/P.A.TO JUDGE rvs/ K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J. ===================== W.P.(C) No. 18724 of 2014======================Dated this the 22[nd] day of July, 2014 J U D G M E N T Ext.P1 is the assessment order passed against the petitioner for the year 2011-12. Against which, petitionerfiled Ext.P2 appeal, which is accompanied by Ext.P3 staypetition before the 2[nd] respondent. Appeal and stay petitionare pending before the 2[nd] respondent. In the meanwhile,coercive proceedings have been initiated. It is in thiscontext, the writ petition has been filed. 2. In the above circumstances, it is directed that theappellate authority, the 2[nd] respondent herein, shall disposeof Ext.P3 stay application within a period of one month fromtoday and the coercive proceedings be stayed until suchorders are passed, which order shall determine the matterthereafter. Writ petition disposed of. K. VINOD CHANDRAN,JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan