Wp(C)/1880/2016 Of Subash Chandra Sutar v. Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax,Cuttack
High Court
29 Mar 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Wp(C)/1880/2016 Of Subash Chandra Sutar v. Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax,Cuttack
Date of order
29 Mar 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/1880/2016 Of Subash Chandra Sutar v. Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax,Cuttack, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
W.P.(C) No.1880 of 2016
29.03.2016
Heard Mr. B. Panda, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.K. Acharya, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department. Challenge has been made in this writ petition to an order dated 07.03.2014 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Berhampur in I.T. Appeal No.0250/12-13 under Annexure-2 for the assessment of year 2010-11.
Admittedly, the said order can be challenged by the before the Tribunal. Hence, we are not inclined to entertain the writ petition since an alternative remedy by way of filing the appeal is available to the petitioner. Accordingly, we direct that If such an appeal is filed within a period of four weeks from today along with an application for condonation of delay, the delay shall be considered liberally in view of the pendency of the writ petition before this Court and the appeal shall be heard and disposed of on its own merits. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. A free copy of this order be handed over to the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department.
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
.
I. Mahanty, J.
Dr. D.P. Choudhury,
J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.