In Wp(C)/18810/2018 Of Surendra Kumar Tibarewal v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
I.A. No.3987 of 2019
03. 13.03.2019
This is an application for modification/clarification of the order dated 30.01.2019 by which W.P.(C) No.18809 of 2018 was disposed of.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed for grant of modification and amendment of the order dated 30.01.2019 directing for deposit of 10% of the disputed demand instead of 20% as has been directed by this Court while disposing of W.P.(C) No.18810 of 2018.
Interim order is not a precedent. The order has already been passed for payment of 20% of the disputed amount, which is just and proper.
The I.A. is dismissed accordingly.
.…….......……………… ( K.S. Jhaveri ) Chief Justice
ss
…………………..……… (K. R. Mohapatra) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue