Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/19035/2021 Of Avanankuzhi Service...

Wp(C)/19035/2021 Of Avanankuzhi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 28 Oct 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/19035/2021 Of Avanankuzhi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
28 Oct 2021
Assessment year(s)
2011-12, 2012-13
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/19035/2021 Of Avanankuzhi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS THURSDAY, THE 28 DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 19035 OF 2021 PETITIONER: AVANANKUZHI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.2387, AVANANKUZHI, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, P.S.JAYASREE, W/O. BIJU RADHAKRISHNAN, AGED 51 YEARS, RESIDING AT VARUTHATTIL, MANGALATH KONAM, KATTACHALKUZHI P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICTBY ADV BABU S. NAIR RESPONDENT: THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXNATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTER, ROOM NO.356, CR BUILDING, I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110 002 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON28.10.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 19035 OF 2021 BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J ................................................ W.P.(C) NO. 19035 OF 2021 …........................................ Dated this the 28[th] day of October, 2021 JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the reply and the documents have been uploaded andno further reliefs needed in the instant case. Accordingly this writ petition is closed. AJM Sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE WP(C) NO. 19035 OF 2021 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 19035/2021 PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS: Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF THE INCOME TAX (APPEALS), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DT 5.3.2019. Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE APPELLANT TRIBUNAL, COCHIN DATED 29.11.2019. Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 13.8.2021 FOR THE YEAR 2011-12. Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 13.8.2021 FOR THE YEAR 2012-13. Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER DT 30.8.2021 BY THE RESPONDENT FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12. Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER DT 30.8.2021 BY THE RESPONDENT FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13. Exhibit P7Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE SCREEN SHOT OF THE E-PORTAL. TRUE COPY OF THE SCREEN SHOT OF THE E-PORTAL. Exhibit P9Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED, 1-9-2021 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12. TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED, 1-9-2021 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13. Exhibit P11 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DATED 3.9.2021. Exhibit P12 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY SUBMITTED BY THE WP(C) NO. 19035 OF 2021 4 PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DATED, 3.9.2021. Exhibit P13TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT SHOWING THEDESPTCH OF EXHIBIT P11. Exhibit P14 TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT SHOWING THEDESPTCH OF EXHIBIT P12. Exhibit P15 TRUE COPY OF THE TRACK CONSIGNMENT ISSUED BY THE POSTAL DEPARTMENT. Exhibit P16 TRUE COPY OF THE TRACK CONSIGNMENT ISSUED BY THE POSTAL DEPARTMENT. RESPONDENT’S EXHIBITS: NIL AJM //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan