In Wp(C)/19038/2019 Of Bibekananda Rout v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.19038 of 2019
Bibekananda Rout ….PetitionerMr. Sidharth Sankar Padhy, Advocate -versus- Principal Chief Commissioner of ….Opposite PartiesIncome Tax & Others
Bibekananda Rout
Mr. Sidharth Sankar Padhy, Advocate
Mr. Radhesheyam Chimanka, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Avinash Kedia, Jr. Standing Counsel
Order No.
08.
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE M. S. RAMAN
ORDER09.01.2023
1. Learned counsel for the Petitioners states that he has no
instructions. A memo to that effect has been filed in Court, which is
taken on record.
2. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. Interim order passed earlier stands vacated.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
Laxmikant
(M. S. Raman)
Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.