Wp(C)/19042/2022 Of Jose Choondal Ukkru v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
High Court
13 Jun 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/19042/2022 Of Jose Choondal Ukkru v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
13 Jun 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/19042/2022 Of Jose Choondal Ukkru v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
MONDAY, THE 13 DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 23RD JYAISHTA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 19042 OF 2022
PETITIONER/S:
JOSE CHOONDAL UKKRU,AGED 60 YEARSXII/162, CHOONDAL HOUSE, CHOONDAL P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680 502.BY ADVS.C.A.JOJOJIMMI JOSESHAFFIE THOMAS
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001.2THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001.3THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1 & TPS, GURUVAYUR, WEST NADA, THRISSUR, PIN-680 101.
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
13.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Aggrieved by Ext.P3 order of assessment relating toassessment year 2016-17, petitioner has preferred an appealbefore the 1[st] respondent, a copy of which is produced asExt.P5. A petition for stay of proceedings pursuant to theassessment order has also been filed as Ext.P6. Petitionerapprehends coercive proceedings even before the petition forstay is considered. Hence, this writ petition.
2. Having considered the submissions of the counsel forthe petitioner as well as the respondents, I am of the opinionthat this writ petition itself can be disposed with a direction.
3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 1[st]respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P6 staypetition, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment. Till such a decision istaken, all coercive proceedings against the petitioner shall bekept in abeyance.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
sd/-
GOPINATH P., JUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 19042/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITSExhibit P1
Exhibit P2
Exhibit P3Exhibit P4
Exhibit P5Exhibit P6Exhibit P7
A TRUE COPY OF THE VENDOR LICENSE RENEWED DATED 01.04.2022 BY AN ORDER NO.S.D. 28/2022 ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER., A TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT FROM THE SUB TREASURY THALAPPILLY DATED 13.05.2022.A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 27.03.2022 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE UNDER SECTION 156 FOR AN AMOUNT OF RS.99,69,659/- DATED 27.03.2022 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 12.05.2022 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
A TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 11.05.2022 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND LETTER DATED 03.06.2022 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.