Wp(C)/19202/2022 Of P.santhosh Kumar v. Assistant Director Of Income Tax
High Court
06 Jul 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/19202/2022 Of P.santhosh Kumar v. Assistant Director Of Income Tax
Date of order
06 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/19202/2022 Of P.santhosh Kumar v. Assistant Director Of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
WEDNESDAY, THE 6 DAY OF JULY 2022 / 15TH ASHADHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 19202 OF 2022
PETITIONER/S:
P.SANTHOSH KUMAR,AGED 75 YEARSS/O PADMANABHAN (LATE) ADVOCATE, LIG-655, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, KOCHI RESIDING SANTHOSH BAHAVAN, EZHUPUNNA, P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT BY ADVS.K.P.CHANDRASEKHARV.ANANDA SHENOY1ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL PROCESSING CENTRE, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, BENGALURU-560 5002INCOME TAX OFFICER,NON- CORP WARD 1 (3), IS PRESS ROAD, KOCHI- 682 0183THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX KOCHI CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, IS PRESS ROAD, KOCHI -682 0184THE MANAGER,STATE BANK OF INDIA, ERNAKULAM BRANCH, KTDC BUILDING, ERNAKULAM -682 011 BY ADVS.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENTADV. A.KUMAR
RESPONDENTS:
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON06.07.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 6[th] day of July, 2022
The petitioner has approached this Court complaining
that a sum of Rs.35,610/-, being the refund of income tax due tothe petitioner, has not been credited to his account.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, it is
the submission of the learned counsel for the 4[th] respondent Bankthat the amount of income tax refund has been credited to theaccount of the petitioner bearing No. 30063403636 with theState Bank of India, Shanmugham Road, Ernakulam on25.03.2022.
Noting the above submission of the learned counsel forthe 4[th] respondent, this writ petition is closed as no furtherdirections are necessary.
Sd/-
GOPINATH P.
JUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 19202/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1
TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
Exhibit P2TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 19.04.2022 TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT
Exhibit P3TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 19.04.2022 BY THE BANK TO THE PETITIONER
Exhibit P4TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 16.05.2022 TO THE GRIEVANCE CELL OF INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.