Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/19202/2022 Of P.santhosh Kumar v....

Wp(C)/19202/2022 Of P.santhosh Kumar v. Assistant Director Of Income Tax

High Court 06 Jul 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/19202/2022 Of P.santhosh Kumar v. Assistant Director Of Income Tax
Date of order
06 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/19202/2022 Of P.santhosh Kumar v. Assistant Director Of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. WEDNESDAY, THE 6 DAY OF JULY 2022 / 15TH ASHADHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 19202 OF 2022 PETITIONER/S: P.SANTHOSH KUMAR,AGED 75 YEARSS/O PADMANABHAN (LATE) ADVOCATE, LIG-655, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, KOCHI RESIDING SANTHOSH BAHAVAN, EZHUPUNNA, P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT BY ADVS.K.P.CHANDRASEKHARV.ANANDA SHENOY1ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL PROCESSING CENTRE, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, BENGALURU-560 5002INCOME TAX OFFICER,NON- CORP WARD 1 (3), IS PRESS ROAD, KOCHI- 682 0183THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX KOCHI CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, IS PRESS ROAD, KOCHI -682 0184THE MANAGER,STATE BANK OF INDIA, ERNAKULAM BRANCH, KTDC BUILDING, ERNAKULAM -682 011 BY ADVS.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENTADV. A.KUMAR RESPONDENTS: THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON06.07.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Dated this the 6[th] day of July, 2022 The petitioner has approached this Court complaining that a sum of Rs.35,610/-, being the refund of income tax due tothe petitioner, has not been credited to his account. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, it is the submission of the learned counsel for the 4[th] respondent Bankthat the amount of income tax refund has been credited to theaccount of the petitioner bearing No. 30063403636 with theState Bank of India, Shanmugham Road, Ernakulam on25.03.2022. Noting the above submission of the learned counsel forthe 4[th] respondent, this writ petition is closed as no furtherdirections are necessary. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE APPENDIX OF WP(C) 19202/2022 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT Exhibit P2TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 19.04.2022 TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT Exhibit P3TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 19.04.2022 BY THE BANK TO THE PETITIONER Exhibit P4TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 16.05.2022 TO THE GRIEVANCE CELL OF INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan