Wp(C)/19557/2020 Of Sun Flower Associates v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
23 Sep 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/19557/2020 Of Sun Flower Associates v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
23 Sep 2020
Assessment year(s)
2010-11, 2013-14
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/19557/2020 Of Sun Flower Associates v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2020 / 1ST ASWINA, 1942
WP(C).No.19557 OF 2020
PETITIONER/S:
SUN FLOWER ASSOCIATESXXII/409, SAGARASREE COMPLEX, OPP. ESSAN THEATRE, SOUTH NADA, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR-680664, REPRESENTEDBY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRI.K.P.BINU.
BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL D. NAIRSRI.R.SREEJITHSMT.TELMA RAJUSMT.SRI HARINI S.P.
RESPONDENT/S:
1INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD -2(5), THRISSUR-680001.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,AAYAKAR BHAVAN, RANGE-1, S.T.NAGAR, THRISSUR-680001.
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI. JOSE JOSEPH,SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON23.09.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has preferred Exts.P3 and P4 applications before the 2ndrespondent under Section 119(2) of the Income Tax Act for condoning a delay inthe filing of returns. The limited prayer at this stage is for a direction to the 2ndrespondent to consider and pass orders on the same expeditiously, after hearingthe petitioner.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learnedGovernment Pleader for the respondents.
On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and thesubmissions made across the Bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P3 and P4 applicationspreferred by the petitioner within an outer limit of four weeks from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner. The petitioner shallproduce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of the judgment before the2nd respondent for further action.
Sd/-
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
EXT.P1COY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FILING RETURNS FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11
EXT.P2COY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FILING RETURNS FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-14ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-14
EXT.P3COY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 01.02.2016 FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT THE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXT.P4COPY OF SEPARATE APPLICATION DATED 27.11.2018 FILED BYTHE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE A.Y.2010-11 & 2013-14THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE A.Y.2010-11 & 2013-14
EXT.P5COPY OF REMINDER DATED 07.12.2017 FILED BEFORE THE 2NDRESPONDENT RESPONDENT
EXT.P6COPY OF REMINDER DATED 11.12.2017 FILED BEFORE THE 1STRESPONDENT RESPONDENT
EXT.P7COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 23.04.2018 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
EXT.P8COPY OF THE POSTING NOTICE DATED 01.07.2019 ISSUED BYTHE 2ND RESPONDENT THE 2ND RESPONDENT
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.