Wp(C)/19618/2021 Of Mohasin Parambathkandi v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
02 Nov 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/19618/2021 Of Mohasin Parambathkandi v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
02 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/19618/2021 Of Mohasin Parambathkandi v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
TUESDAY, THE 2 DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 11TH KARTHIKA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 19618 OF 2021
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.11.2021, THECOURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
==========================
W.P.(C) No.19618 of 2021
---------------------------------------
Dated this the 2[nd] day of November, 2021
JUDGMENT
Petitioner is an assessee under the Income Tax Act,
1961. Aggrieved by Ext.P1 assessment order,relating to assessment year 2012-13, petitioner haspreferred an appeal before the 2[nd] respondent, a copyof which is produced as Ext.P2. A petition for stayof proceedings pursuant to the assessment order hasalso been filed as Ext.P3. Petitioner apprehendscoercive proceedings to be effected even before thepetition for stay is considered. Hence, this writpetition.
2. Having considered the submissions of the counsel forthe petitioner as well as the respondents, I am ofthe opinion that this writ petition itself can bedisposed of with a direction.the petitioner as well as the respondents, I am ofthe opinion that this writ petition itself can bedisposed of with a direction.
WP(C) NO. 19618 OF 2021
3
3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 2[nd]
respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3
stay petition, within a period of three months from
the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
4. Till such a decision is taken, all coercive proceedings
against the petitioner shall be kept in abeyance.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS,
JUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 19618/2021
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.