Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/19676/2020 Of Saptha Marketing Ass...

Wp(C)/19676/2020 Of Saptha Marketing Associates v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 23 Sep 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/19676/2020 Of Saptha Marketing Associates v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
23 Sep 2020
Assessment year(s)
2010-11
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/19676/2020 Of Saptha Marketing Associates v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2020 / 1ST ASWINA, 1942 WP(C).No.19676 OF 2020 PETITIONER: M/S.SAPTHA MARKETING ASSOCIATESXXII/408,SAGARASREE COMPLEX,OPP.ESSEN THEATRE,SOUTH NADA,KODUNGALLUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SRI.K.P.BINU.BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL D. NAIRSRI.R.SREEJITHSMT.TELMA RAJUSMT.SRI HARINI S.P. RESPONDENTS: 1INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD -2(5),THISSUR-680001.2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,AAYAKAR BHAVAN,RANGE-1,S.T.NAGAR, THRISSUR-680001. BY ADV.SRI. JOSE JOSEPH,SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23.09.2020,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The petitioner has preferred Exts.P2 and P3 applications before the 2[nd]respondent under Section 119(2) of the Income Tax Act for condoning adelay in the filing of returns. The limited prayer is for a direction to the2[nd] respondent to consider and pass orders on the same expeditiously,after hearing the petitioner. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and thelearned Standing counsel for the respondents. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case andthe submissions made across the Bar, I dispose the writ petition with adirection to the 2[nd] respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P2and P3 applications within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copyof this judgment, after hearing the petitioner. The petitioner shallproduce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of thejudgmentbefore the 2[nd] respondent for further action. Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS EXHIBIT -P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF FILING RETURNS FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11 EXHIBIT P2- TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DATED 01.02.2016 FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P3- TRUE COPY OF SEPARATE APPLICATION DATED 22.12.2017 FILEDBY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF REMINDER DATED 7.12.2017 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P5- TRUE COPY OF REMINDER DATED 11.12.2017 FILED BEFORE THE1ST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P6- TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 23.04.2018 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan