Wp(C)/19770/2013 Of Raju N.a v. The Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) And Commissioner Of Income Tax

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST 2013/21ST SRAVANA, 1935 WP(C).No. 19770 of 2013 (U) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ RAJU N.A., S/O.ANTHAPPAN, PROPRIETOR OF OMEGA HERITAGE, PUNKUNNAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.K.DILEEP KUMAR. RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) AND COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, 7TH FLOOR, KERA BHAVAN, SRVHS ROAD, ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-682 011. 2. THE TAX RECOVERY OFFICER, CIRCLE 2(1), RANGE 2, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, THRISSUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680 001. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, INCOME TAX. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-08-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. WP(C).No. 19770 of 2013 (U) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:-NIL.//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. V.CHITAMBARESH,J ------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.19770 OF 2013----------------------------------------- Dated this the 12[th] day of August, 2013 JUDGMENT The petitioner has filed Ext.P2 appeal accompanied by Ext.P3 petition for stay against Ext.P1 order ofassessment. The petitioner is apprehensive of thecoercive steps in recovery of the disputed tax in themeanwhile. 2. I direct the first respondent to consider Ext.P3petition with notice to the petitioner within a period of onemonth. The coercive steps for realisation of the disputedtax pursuant to Ext.P1 order shall be put on hold in themeanwhile. 3. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the Writ Petition with the judgment before the first respondent forcompliance. The Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, JUDGE. /True Copy/ P.A. To Judge