Wp(C)/19817/2011 Of M/S.tmt Granites (P) Ltd v. Agricultural Income Tax
High Court
21 Jul 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/19817/2011 Of M/S.tmt Granites (P) Ltd v. Agricultural Income Tax
Date of order
21 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp(C)/19817/2011 Of M/S.tmt Granites (P) Ltd v. Agricultural Income Tax, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Therefore, without prejudice to thatright this writ petition is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
THURSDAY, THE 21ST JULY 2011 / 30TH ASHADHA 1933
WP(C).No. 19817 of 2011(B)
-------------------------
PETITIONER :
--------------------
M/S.TMT GRANITES (P) LTD, IX/302,
MANGALAM DAM (P.O), PALAKKAD,
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,
TOM GEORGE.
BY ADVS. SRI.N.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR
SMT.K.HYMAVATHY
RESPONDENT :
-----------------------
AGRL.INCOME TAX & COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,
ALATHUR - 678 541.
BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. C.K. GOVINDAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 21/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
Mn
WP(C).No. 19817 of 2011(B)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXT.P1: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THERESPONDENT DATED 14.7.2011.RESPONDENT DATED 14.7.2011.
EXT.P2: COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENTYEAR 2011-12 DATED 13.07.2011.YEAR 2011-12 DATED 13.07.2011.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS - NIL
//TRUE COPY//
Mn
P.A. TO JUDGE
S. SIRI JAGAN, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -W.P.(C)No.19817 of 2011- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Dated this the 21[st] day of July, 2011
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner challenges Ext.P2 order passed by therespondent refusing to incorporate additional items in theregistration certificate of the petitioner under the KeralaValue Added Tax Act. I am not inclined to entertain thiswrit petition since the petitioner has an effective alternateremedy by way of appeal against Ext.P2 order as providedunder the statute. Therefore, without prejudice to thatright this writ petition is dismissed.
Sd/-
S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE//True copy//
P.A. TO JUDGE
shg/
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.