Wp(C)/19886/2014 Of Naduvil Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF AUGUST 2014/10TH SRAVANA, 1936 WP(C).No. 19886 of 2014 (I) ---------------------------- PETITIONER : ------------------ NADUVIL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, NADUVIL, THALIPARAMBA, KANNUR - 670582 RPERESENTED BHY ITS SECRETARY MARIAKUTTY BY ADV. SRI.S.ARUN RAJ RESPONDENTS : ------------------------ 1. INCME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 4, KANNUR - 670006. 2. THE COMMISSIONR OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) - I, MANANCHIRA, CALICUT. BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-08-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: BP WP(C).No. 19886 of 2014 (I) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : P1:COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DT 22/3/2013 PASSED BY THE R1 AND THE DEMAND NOTICE FOR THE AY 2008-09.THE DEMAND NOTICE FOR THE AY 2008-09. P2:COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DT 223/2013 PASSED BY THE R1AND THEDEMAND NOTICE FOR THE AY 2010-11.DEMAND NOTICE FOR THE AY 2010-11. P3:COPY OF THE STATUTORY FIRST APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER SOCIETY BEFORE THE R2 FOR THE AY 2008-2009.SOCIETY BEFORE THE R2 FOR THE AY 2008-2009. P4:COPY OF THE STATUTORY FIRST APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER SOCIETY BEFORE THE R2 FOR THE AY 2010-11.SOCIETY BEFORE THE R2 FOR THE AY 2010-11. P5:COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER SOCIETY BEFORE THE R2 FOR THE AY 2008-09.THE R2 FOR THE AY 2008-09. P6:COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER SOCIETY BEFORE THE R2 FOR THE AY 2010-11.THE R2 FOR THE AY 2010-11. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 19886 of 2014 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated 1[st] August, 2014 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JUDGMENT Exts.P1 and P2 are the assessment orderspassed against the petitioner for the years 2008-09 and 2010-11, against which the petitioner filedExts.P3 and P4 appeals along with Exts.P5 and P6stay petitions, which are stated to be pendingbefore the 2[nd] respondent. In the meanwhile,coercive proceedings have been initiated. It is inthis context, the writ petition has been filed. 2. In the above circumstances, it is directedthat the appellate authority, the 2[nd] respondentherein, shall dispose of Exts.P5 and P6 staypetitions, within a period of one month fromtoday and the coercive proceedings be stayed untilsuch orders are passed, which orders shalldetermine the matter thereafter. Writ petition disposed of. SD/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, Judge Mrcs //True Copy//