Wp(C)/19928/2015 Of Shri. Thomas Muthoot v. The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Thiruvalla
High Court
02 Jul 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/19928/2015 Of Shri. Thomas Muthoot v. The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Thiruvalla
Date of order
02 Jul 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/19928/2015 Of Shri. Thomas Muthoot v. The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Thiruvalla, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above. ln Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
THURSDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF JULY 2015/11TH ASHADHA, 1937
WP(C).No. 19928 of 2015 (M)
-----------------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
----------------------
SHRI. THOMAS MUTHOOT, MUTHOOT HOUSE, KOZHENCHERRY, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 689 641.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SR.)
SRI.V.P.NARAYANAN SMT.DIVYA RAVINDRAN
RESPONDENT(S):
-------------------------
1. THE DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME TAX, THIRUVALLA, CIRCLE 1, ENNIKKATTIL ESTATE, NEAR KSRTC BUS STATION, THIRUVALLA 689 101. CIRCLE 1, ENNIKKATTIL ESTATE, NEAR KSRTC BUS STATION, THIRUVALLA 689 101.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), PUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDINGS, SASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM 686 001. PUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDINGS, SASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM 686 001.
BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 19928 of 2015 (M)
----------------------------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-------------------------------------
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS
---------------------------------------
NIL.
/ TRUE COPY /P.S. TO JUDGE
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
*******************************************************W.P.(C) No.19928 of 2015
*******************************************************Dated this the 2[nd] day of July, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, impugning Ext.P1Assessment Order, filedExt.P2 appeal before the second respondent. The petitioner alsofiled Ext.P4 stay application.
2. Considering the facts and circumstances, there shall be adirection to the second respondent to consider the stay applicationwithin a period of two months after issuing notice to the petitioner.Till the disposal of the stay application, all recovery proceedingsbased on the Assessment Order shall be kept in abeyance.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
ln
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue