Wp(C)/20088/2020 Of Pragati Public School,Rourkela v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Sambalpur
High Court
12 Feb 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Wp(C)/20088/2020 Of Pragati Public School,Rourkela v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Sambalpur
Date of order
12 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/20088/2020 Of Pragati Public School,Rourkela v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Sambalpur, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
02. 12.02.2021 1. This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.
2. Heard Mr. Damodar Pati, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. R.S. Chimanka, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Opposite Parties.
3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the rectification petitions dated 8[th] May, 2019, 18[th] September, 2019 and 14[th] February, 2020 (Annexure-3 series) filed by the Petitioner against the assessment order dated 27[th] March, 2015 are pending consideration since long.
4. It will be open to the Petitioner to file an application before the Income Tax Officer (Exemption), Sambalpur (Opposite Party No.3) for expeditious disposal of those rectification applications.
5. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.
6. As the restrictions due to the COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s website or print out thereof at par with certified copy in the manner prescribed, vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25[th] March, 2020.
( Dr. S. Muralidhar ) Chief Justice
(B.P. Routray) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue