Wp(C)/20122/2006 Of M/S.kap Constructions v. Income Tax Officer & Others
High Court
18 Mar 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/20122/2006 Of M/S.kap Constructions v. Income Tax Officer & Others
Date of order
18 Mar 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/20122/2006 Of M/S.kap Constructions v. Income Tax Officer & Others, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed fordefault. vi/ (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
FRIDAY, THE 18TH MARCH 2011 / 27TH PHALGUNA 1932
WP(C).No. 20122 of 2006(U)
--------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
---------------
M/S.KAP CONSTRUCTIONS,
CITY CENTRE, ROUND WEST,
THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS
EXECUTIVE PARTNER K.K.SHIHABUDEEN.
BY ADV. SRI.DALE P.KURIEN
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
CIRCLE-II (1), RANGE - 2, THRISSUR.
2. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -
TAX, CIRCLE - I, DIVISION-I, THRISSUR.
3. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
THRISSUR.
4. M/S.KAOSER CHARITABLE TRUST,
KANNUR.
ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL,GOI(TAXES) FOR R1 TO R3
SRI.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC FOR IT FOR R1 TO R3
SC SRI. JOSE JOSEPH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 18/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
--------------------------------------------------
W.P.(C) NO.20122 OF 2006(U)
--------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 18[th] day of March, 2011
J U D G M E N T
The writ petition was admitted way back on 1.8.2006 andeven now service of notice on the respondents is remainingincomplete.
2. When the matter came up for orders on 11.3.2011, therewas no representation on behalf of the petitioner and thereforethe case was posted today. Today also there was norepresentation.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed fordefault.
vi/
(ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue