Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/20237/2018 Of M/S.hillwood Timbers...

Wp(C)/20237/2018 Of M/S.hillwood Timbers v. Income Tax Officer, Ward Tds, Calicut

High Court 20 Jun 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/20237/2018 Of M/S.hillwood Timbers v. Income Tax Officer, Ward Tds, Calicut
Date of order
20 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/20237/2018 Of M/S.hillwood Timbers v. Income Tax Officer, Ward Tds, Calicut, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE 2018 / 30TH JYAISHTA, 1940 WP(C).No. 20237 of 2018 PETITIONER(S) HILLWOOD TIMBERS MAKKARAPARAMBA, PUNARPPA, MALAPPURAM-676 507, BY V.SHERIFF, MANAGING PARTNER. BY ADVS.SRI.P.RAGHUNATH SRI.PREMJIT NAGENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): 1. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD TDS, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, CALICUT-673 001. AAYAKAR BHAVAN, CALICUT-673 001. 2. TAX RECOVERY OFFICER (TDS) CR BUILDING, IS PRESS ROAD, KOCHI-682018. R BY SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-06-2018,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX //TRUE COPY//SD/-P.A. TO JUDGE P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J. =============== W.P.(C.) No. 20237 of 2018 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20[th] day of June, 2018 JUDGMENT Exts.P4 to P6 are applications preferred by the petitioner invoking Section 154 of the Income Tax Act(the Act) for rectification of Exts.P1 to P3 assessmentorders issued under Section 206C of the Act. Thegrievance of the petitioner in the writ petition concernsthe delay on the part of the first respondent in taking adecision on the said applications. The petitioner,therefore, seeks appropriate directions in this regard. 2.Heard the learned counsel for thepetitioner as also the learned Standing Counsel for theRevenue. Heard the learned counsel for the 3.Having regard to the facts andcircumstances of this case, I deem it appropriate to Having regard to the facts and W.P.(C).No.20237 of 2018 : 2 : dispose of the writ petition directing the first respondentto take a decision on Exts.P4 to P6 applications withnotice to the petitioner, within six weeks from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment. Ordered accordingly.Needless to say that till orders are passed as directedabove, further proceedings for the realisation of theamounts covered by Exts.P1 to P3 assessment ordersshall be deferred. Sd/- SKS P.B. SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan