Wp(C)/20408/2013 Of Amluya Pr.bhoi v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
22 Sep 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Wp(C)/20408/2013 Of Amluya Pr.bhoi v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
22 Sep 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/20408/2013 Of Amluya Pr.bhoi v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of the nature of the prayer, we direct the concerned Assessing Officer (Opposite Party No.1) to conclude the assessment proceeding, pending if any, at an early date.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
WPC No.20408 of 2013
08. 22.09.2015 None appears for the petitioner at the time of call. Mr. Acharya, learned Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department is present. On perusal of the records, it appears that prayer has been made essentially seeking a direction to the Assessing Officer to complete the assessment proceeding pending before him and consequently, if any refund is found to refund the same.
In view of the nature of the prayer, we direct the concerned Assessing Officer (Opposite Party No.1) to conclude the assessment proceeding, pending if any, at an early date.
With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ application stands disposed of.
Free copy of this order be handed over to the learned Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
...
I.Mahant
y, J.
........
Dr.D.P.Choudhury, J. Misc. Case No.18703 of 2013
09. 22.09.2015 In view of the order passed today in W.P.(C) No.20408 of 2013, the present Misc. Case stands disposed of.
...
I.Mahant
y, J.
........
Dr.D.P.Choudh
ury, J.
Ranjan
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.