Case Law › High Court › Wp(C)/20426/2019 Of George Josph K.m v....

Wp(C)/20426/2019 Of George Josph K.m v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 14 Mar 2022 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

14 Mar 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp(C)/20426/2019 Of George Josph K.m v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawnreserving the aforesaid liberty.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMASMONDAY, THE 14 DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 23 PHALGUNA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 20426 OF 2019 PETITIONER: GEORGE JOSPH K.MAGED 62 YEARS,S/O. K.J.MANNUEL, PROPRIETOR, M/S. VIMAL GAS AGENCIES, KADUNGAMPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHERIAKADAVU, CHELLANAM, ERNAKULAM-682 008. BY ADV A.KRISHNAN RESPONDENTS: BY ADV.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM -SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSIONON 14.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING: BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W. P. (C) No.20426 OF 2019 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 14[th] day of March, 2022 JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission towithdraw this writ petition reserving liberty of the petitioner topursue statutory remedies available in law. The counsel for the petitioner also seeks 36 days’ time topursue statutory remedies available in law. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawnreserving the aforesaid liberty. Sd/-BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE nk

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.