Case Law › High Court › Wp(C)/20549/2024 Of Debasish Mohapatra v...

Wp(C)/20549/2024 Of Debasish Mohapatra v. Principal Comnr Of Income Tax, Aayakar Bhawan, Bbsr

High Court 28 Oct 2024 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Date of order

28 Oct 2024

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/20549/2024 Of Debasish Mohapatra v. Principal Comnr Of Income Tax, Aayakar Bhawan, Bbsr, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: 4. // 2 // The writ petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.20549 of 2024 …. Debasish Mohapatra Petitioner – Represented By Adv. Mrs. G.K. Roychoudhury, Advocate -versus- Principal Commissioner of Income ….Opposite PartiesTax, Aayakar Bhawan, Bhubaneswar and another –Represented By Adv. Mr. Avinash Kedia, Junior Standing Counsel CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO ORDER 28.10.2024 Order No. 02. 1.Mr. Kedia, learned advocate, Junior Standing Counsel appears on behalf of revenue and submits, impugned demand has since been reduced to nil. He hands up his instruction dated 24[th] October, 2024 issued by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax. 2.Mrs. Roychoudhury, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner. 3. Petitioner has obtained relief sought for in the writ petition. Considering the demand has been reduced to nil, the order of status quo has lost its force. 4. // 2 // The writ petition is disposed of. (Arindam Sinha) Judge (M.S. Sahoo) Judge Sks Signature Not Verified Digitally SignedSigned by: SISIR KUMAR SETHIReason: AuthenticationLocation: ORISSA HIGH COURTDate: 28-Oct-2024 19:42:05

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.