Wp(C)/20588/2014 Of Bindhu Sunilkumar v. The Income Tax Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF AUGUST 2014/17TH SRAVANA, 1936 WP(C).No. 20588 of 2014 (W) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------- BINDHU SUNILKUMAR, SNEHA THEERAM, THODUPUZHA EAST.P.O. BY ADV. SMT.S.K.DEVI. RESPONDENT(S): ------------- 1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD NO.1, MAHIMA TOWERS, TEMPLE BYE PASS ROAD,THODUPUZHA-685 585. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (APPEALS), ERNAKULAM-682015. BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-08-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 20588 of 2014 (W) APPENDIX RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:----------------------- NIL./true copy/P.A.TO JUDGE rvs/ K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 20588 of 2014 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated 8[th] August, 2014 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JUDGMENT Ext.P1 is the assessment order passed againstthe petitioner for the year 2009-10, against whichthe petitioner filed Ext.P2 appeal along withExt.P4 stay petition before the 2[nd] respondent.Appeal and stay petition are stated to be pendingbefore the 2[nd] respondent. In the meanwhile,coercive proceedings have been initiated as perExt.P3. It is in this context, the writ petitionhas been filed. 2. In the above circumstances, it is directedthat the appellate authority, the 2[nd] respondentherein, shall dispose of Ext.P4 stay petitionwithin a period of one month from today and thecoercive proceedings be stayed until such ordersare passed, which orders shall determine thematter thereafter. Writ petition disposed of. Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN Judge Mrcs //True Copy//