Wp(C)/20788/2020 Of K.c.antony v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Circle I)
High Court
14 Dec 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/20788/2020 Of K.c.antony v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Circle I)
Date of order
14 Dec 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/20788/2020 Of K.c.antony v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Circle I), the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
MONDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 23RD AGRAHAYANA, 1942
WP(C).No.20788 OF 2020(W)
PETITIONER:
K.C.ANTONYAGED 60 YEARS
S/O. LATE CHACKO, CONTRACTOR, KAITHACKAL HOUSE, CHEMMALAMATTOM P. O., ERATTUPETTA VIA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686 529.
BY ADVS.SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHASMT.ARCHANA U.
RESPONDENTS:
1COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CIRCLE I)PUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDING, LAL BAHADUR SASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM - 686 001.2INCOME TAX OFFICERPUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDING, LAL BAHADUR SASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM - 686 001.
R1-2 BY ADV. SRI.P.K.RAVINDRANATHA MENON (SR.)R1-2 BY JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSIONON 14.12.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Taking note of the submission of the learned counsel for thepetitioner that an application under Section 119 of the Income Tax Act isbeing filed before the respondent, the Writ petition is closed withoutprejudice to the right of the petitioner to pursue the said application.
Sd/-
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE
mns/14.12.2020
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.